![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Posted by andy "fuzzbubble" sholz on Novembe
r 04, 2002 at 22:44:31:
In Reply to: Some help would help posted by
well, i have a great opinion for you, haveing both of them in my house, my dad owns the timmy, and i have the f-5 first of all let me tell you about the f-5s, go to this site, and d/l the movie, nuff said http://www.tripleapaintball.com/VIDEO.html
its one of the sweetest markers i've ever used, it throws an ungodly amount of paint accurately, i love it, now let me tell you about the timmy, first of all, i dont necisarrily think its a bad gun, just high matinence, (atleast the one we have) we've had it for less than a year, and it has had to go back to bob long twice, it hasnt made it through an entire game without something going wrong, first the board took atricycle, because for some reason he didnt waterproof them, and the slightest moisture will fry the board, (#1 reason i dont like electros personally, w/ the exception of emags, and emag extremes) then the seals in the ram blew out, and it hadnt even been used, they just blew out, still not sure why, is it all bad, no some of the guys in my local paintball store will swear by the new gzs, but from a personal standpoint the f-5 is (atleast from what i've seen) more reliable, and less matinence hungry, i'd rather be playing than sitting on the side working on my gun