![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Posted by Razorpb on October 29, 2002 at 15:17:30:
In Reply to: Re: Autococker difference posted by Seitenschneider on October 29, 2002 at 08:01:34:
With the STO your mainly buying for the flashy looks, stock is much cheaper, and you can start your own scheme of milling if you want, rather than take theirs, if you notice it is the same body as the Black Magic, without the flames. Building your own cocker from parts will be more expensive, but you'll get exactly what you want.
Razor
: In my eyes the STO is more or less the same than a stock cocker. It only has the milling and STO front pneumatics. I´d go for the stock and build it up to your likings unless you really like the looks of the STO......
: But then if I was to get a cocker I´d build it up from scratch or get a freeflow anyway ;)
: : If I buy a Worrgames 2002 Vertical Feed Autococker will it shot just as straight and just as well as an STO and also is it worth it to buy it.