Posted by: Jason "Zippy" Finnie on April 29, 2003 at 14:54:56

I would tend to disagree with getting a stabilizer. I have owned two Spyders in my life, and both ran fine off CO2 using only a vertical expansion chamber. Cheaper too with just an expansion chamber. Don't waste your money with a stabilizer when you plan on getting the HPA anyway. You can still use your expansion chamber as a handle with HPA, but with no need to double regulate HPA you won't need the stabilizer later. : I would get a male stabilizer. A mini expansion chamber put on after a regulator totaly defeats the purpose. I do believe you can get them anodized to match now to if you want. You won't need to change anything, just remove thattricyclepy little x-chamber. The reg may require adustment, but that's easy enough. Stabilizer, good choice.

Follow Ups: Re: Spyder xtra + regulator Jon "Jonwes" West 00:05:33 05/18/03 (0) Post a Followup Show your name as: DefaultRealnameBothNickname E-Mail address (eg: joeschmoe@aol.com): Show your e-mail address? DefaultYesNo Your Password: Don't have a password? CLICK HERE - Forgot your password? CLICK HERE Subject: Subject:Message: : I would tend to disagree with getting a stabilizer. I have owned two Spyders in my life, and both ran fine off CO2 using only a vertical expansion chamber. Cheaper too with just an expansion chamber. Don't waste your money with a stabilizer when you plan on getting the HPA anyway. You can still use your expansion chamber as a handle with HPA, but with no need to double regulate HPA you won't need the stabilizer later. : : I would get a male stabilizer. A mini expansion chamber put on after a regulator totaly defeats the purpose. I do believe you can get them anodized to match now to if you want. You won't need to change anything, just remove thattricyclepy little x-chamber. The reg may require adustment, but that's easy enough. Stabilizer, good choice. [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ WARPIG Tech Talk - Air ]